Certification for agent-built software

Your agents write the code. Who checks it?

You turned on a coding agent. Output went up. Now someone re-reads every change before it ships, and that someone never gets to go home.

jusFactory certifies the people and the code in an agent-built pipeline, so you can ship software no human wrote and still stand behind it.

Get certified, $25 See how it works

Live with a handful of Upekkha portfolio companies. Built by people who already blew up their own inference bill so you do not have to.

Code got free.
Trust didn't.

The model is finished. Most of what it can do still is not allowed near production.

Code

Free

Trust

Not yet

Companies adopted agents. Far fewer run them in prod. The capability is built, paid for, and sitting idle, because nobody can prove the output is safe to ship.

More agents writing more code does not fix this. It makes the pile bigger. The question was never can it write the code. It is can you trust the code it wrote.

That is the thing we sell. Proof.

One root cause. Three people who feel it.

Agents can write code. They cannot be trusted, coordinated, or audited, because the intent behind the code was never captured in a system.

The engineer feels it

Nobody coordinates the agents

Cursor, Copilot, Claude Code each make one developer faster in one repo. Two engineers' agents ship contradictory changes and neither knows. You sped up the individual. The bottleneck was always coordination.

The CFO feels it

Cost per shipped requirement

Token bills tripled even as prices fell. The bill measures burn, not conversion. A vague prompt, a wrong guess, a wrong ship, then round after round of rework. The meter never tells you what the tokens produced.

Compliance feels it

Specification drift

The code stops matching what the business asked for, and you find out in an audit, not in development. When an auditor asks why a function exists, no link survives from intent to shipped code.

Underneath all three: context lives in the wrong place. In a senior engineer's head, a stale doc, a 2014 comment that says do not touch this. AI does not fix tribal knowledge. It amplifies it.

Same problem, a different door for each person who signs →

One product. Three rungs. You are on rung one.

Live now

Certify the engineer

A developer takes a test that proves they can direct, correct, and check agent work. Pass, and you know this person can run an agent fleet without burning the place down. $25 an attempt.

In build

Certify the agent

What good engineers trusted and rejected on rung one becomes the bar an agent has to clear. Once it is certified, you stop re-reading every result. You spot-check a worker you already trust.

Ahead

Certify the code

Trusted code ships by default instead of by exception. The check lives in the system, not in a person on call at 2am.

We did not ship all three and call it a platform. We shipped the rung that works. The rest is on the roadmap, in public, where you can watch it.

Prove you can run agents. Get a credential that says so.

Anyone can paste a prompt. Directing a fleet of agents, catching the one that quietly broke prod, and knowing which output to trust is a different skill. There is no degree for it yet.

jusCode is the test. You direct real agent work, correct it, decide what is safe to ship. Pass and you have proof an employer actually believes.

Take the test ↗

$25 an attempt. No subscription. No talk to sales.
Takes an afternoon, not a bootcamp.
The credential travels. It is about you, not one company's codebase.
We say the quiet part. Every attempt also teaches our system what good judgment looks like. You pay to prove you are good. We learn what good looks like. Both true.

What we will not pretend

The agent is not perfect. A certified agent still gets spot-checked, same as a senior dev whose PRs you mostly trust but still skim.
Your bill is not safe by default. Agentic workloads loop, retry, and burn tokens you did not budget for. So we cap spend before the call, not after the invoice. We learned that one the hard way, with a real product, in front of 130+ real users.
AI is not the reason to buy. The hype gets us the meeting. It is not the product. Trust is the product.

If a verification tool oversells, you should not trust it. So we do not.

Everyone owns a piece. Nobody owns the part that matters.

The model labs write the code. They cannot certify their own output.
NVIDIA and the clouds sell the compute. How much you run is capped by how much you trust.
GitHub owns the merge. It does not own the gap between merging and shipping unattended.
The auditors and insurers vouch for things. They have no way to vouch for code no human wrote.

When something machine-written breaks in prod and someone asks who approved it, the answer has to exist. That answer is the thing we are building. The labs cannot make it, because the proof comes from human judgment they do not have. We are already collecting it, $25 at a time.

Future software factories will build themselves. Our job is to make sure you can still trust what they build.

Pricing

$25

One test, one attempt, twenty-five dollars. Pass and you keep the credential. No seats. No annual contract. No demo gate. Buy one. Take it. See if it is any good.

Get started ↗Certifying a team? Talk volume