OpenFactory

AI software factory / OpenFactory

Your developers got faster.Did your company?

Coding agents made code abundant.

But making coding 10× faster does not make your company ship software 10× faster.

The bottleneck moves.

OpenFactory finds what is limiting software production, attacks the constraint, measures what changed, then finds the next one.

Works with Claude Code, Codex and the agents your team already uses.

01 / The new constraint

Code got cheap. Software production did not.

Your engineers can now generate in hours what used to take days.

So they generate more.

Then something else starts breaking.

  1. 01

    More code reaches review than humans can inspect.

  2. 02

    Agents finish tasks that are not actually finished.

  3. 03

    Context gets lost between tools.

  4. 04

    QA cannot absorb the new volume.

  5. 05

    Engineers spend their new productivity babysitting agents.

  6. 06

    A repo built for ten humans struggles with fifty parallel workers.

You removed the coding bottleneck. You did not remove the bottleneck.

You moved it.That is why adding another coding agent does not necessarily make the company faster.

02 / The software factory

You already have the workers. Now build the factory.

Claude can build. Codex can check. Devin can take a task.

Tomorrow another agent will be better at something else.

01Claudebuild
02Codexcheck
03Devintake a task
04Nextplug in
Stable layerOpenFactoryworkflows / context / verification / history

OpenFactory sits around the agents you already use. It coordinates work between them, carries context, lets one model verify another, routes failed work back for correction, brings humans in when judgment is required, and records what happened.

But orchestration is not the goal.Throughput is.

The question is not how much code your agents generated.

How much useful software made it through the factory?

03 / Independent verification

One model makes. Another checks.

A coding agent should not grade its own work. Different models fail differently. OpenFactory can use that disagreement instead of hiding it.

04 / What got through

41 verified. 12 sent back. 3 need you.

Most agent systems tell you what they completed. OpenFactory tells you what actually got through.

41verified
12sent back
3need you
What passed.What failed.What was retried.Where humans intervened.How much it cost.How long it took.Where work is piling up.
Because once verification gets faster, something else becomes the constraint.That queue is your next bottleneck.

05 / The moving target

The bottleneck keeps moving.

This is the part that matters.

Every improvement exposes the next constraint.

  1. 01CodingMade faster
  2. 02ReviewQueue forms
  3. 03VerificationAutomate it
  4. 04QANext constraint
  5. 05DeploymentKeep looking

Make coding faster. Review becomes the bottleneck.

Improve review. Verification becomes the bottleneck.

Automate verification. QA becomes the bottleneck.

Fix QA. Now it might be deployment. Architecture. Context. Coordination. Human judgment.

Good.

That is what happens when a production system gets faster.

OpenFactory is built around a simpler ideaThere will always be a constraint. Find it.

06 / Replaceable workers

The workers will change. The factory is yours.

There will not be one magical coding agent. Today's best model will be beaten. New agents will appear. Your engineers will use several of them.

That is fine.

ClaudeCodexDevinWhatever comes next
Your software factoryYour workflowsYour verificationYour production historyYour knowledge

OpenFactory is not trying to win the coding-agent war. It is the production system around the workers you choose.

The workers will change. The factory gets better.

07 / Factory memory

Every run should make the next run better.

An agent makes a mistake. Another catches it. A human corrects an assumption.

A particular model repeatedly fails at a certain kind of task. A workflow keeps getting stuck in the same place.

Those are not just failures. They are production data.

OpenFactory / ledgerappend only
08:31Claude Code

build assigned

08:38Codex

idempotency missing

08:41Claude Code

fix returned

08:44Codex

evidence verified

Today's catch → tomorrow's default
What to delegate.Who should do it.What needs independent verification.When a human should enter.Where production keeps getting stuck.

08 / The self-improving harness

How the self-improving harness gets better.

Models change. The harness keeps the evidence, corrections, routing decisions and human judgment that made the work reliable.

It remembers evidence

Failures, corrections, accepted proof and human overrides become durable production history—not a vague chat transcript.

It changes bounded defaults

Future runs can choose a better worker, add an independent check, strengthen a gate or escalate sooner.

You keep authority

The harness proposes from observed results. Humans still own policy, risk thresholds and what is allowed to ship.

09 / The operating loop

Find the bottleneck. Solve it. Find the next one.

We do not assume your problem is coding. Or verification. Or orchestration. We measure it.

  1. 01Give OpenFactory a real production flow.
  2. 02See what gets through and what comes back.
  3. 03See where humans enter and where the queue forms.
  4. 04Attack the constraint. Measure again.

Repeat.

Run your own AI factory

Want to run it yourself?

Good.

Download OpenFactory. Point it at real work. Let one agent build and another verify. See what happens.

No sales call required.Get OpenFactory

One flow that matters

Want your company to ship faster?

Do not give us your whole engineering organization. Give us one production flow that matters to the business.

Something that takes weeks and should take days.

Or days and should take hours.

We will baseline where the time goes, identify the constraint, attack it with OpenFactory and measure what changed.

If we cannot materially change the economics, you will know. If we can, we will find the next bottleneck.

Talk to us